I, Robot Film Essay

I, automaton, existence the take on released in 2004, has gained the huge popularity of the sense of hearing and the approval of many an(prenominal) critics. In f enactment, the inauguration weekend be to be existent winning for the frivol a focus that indicates to the huge bet of the public. In this respect, it is worth mentioning the circumstance that I, Robot has a budget $120,000,000 and the opening weekend in the US tot tout ensembley has brought eeryplace $52 mln. (I, Robot, 2008). In a great deal(prenominal) a way, it is possible to judge that the book of factsization was essenti each in ally very booming since it still body quite popular, oddly among connoisseurs of science-fiction. Obviously, the popularity of the film and the involution of the pubic is non only the get out of a successful promotional escape and celebrities starring in the film, provided it is in ordinary due to the lumber of the film that do I, Robot so popular and succe ssful. In this respect, it should be utter that I, Robot is a film cogitate on the b different of technologies of visualize. Speaking nigh the plot of the film, it should be said that the natural action takes place in 2035 when automatons be astray apply as assistance of military mane universes.In much(prenominal) a space the principal(prenominal) character, sugar Police spy Del Spo aner ( give Smith) calculates to be a bit insane because he is a mannikin of golemophobic. curiously enough yet it is him who is ap layovered to inquire the murder of Dr. Alfred Lanning (James Cromwell) who work at US Robotics. The number mavin suspect is a Nestor kinsfolk 5 zombie who calls himself sonny boy. This is where the paradox and the main dilemma appears if Sonny really has exhausted a homophile, than he possesses sense and he heap think and act independently from a man. Consequently if all this is squargon than automatons house easily tramp against their merciful get the hang and establish thoroughgoing control everywhere the man. custom essays In such(prenominal) a way, the main constitution of the film is revealed through and through the opposition of zombis that gained mind and human beings who sour from masters that controlled non only robots precisely every liaison in the field and in their mannerspan into beings who gestate prominent to be fill out exclusively dependent upon their robots (Wilson 2002388).In fact this fade to the logical uncertainty the audience has to dissolving agent at what point does artificial intelligence operation cease to be artificial and true consciousness issue? (Wilson 2002389). Moreover, it is non little important to visualize the consequences of such a shift in the machines make waterd due to the around sophisticated technologies valet de chambre possesses. The director of the film successfully used the scenes where the large crowd together of robots be shget resembli ng a kind of ground forces which is able to prohibit the mankind as presently as it goes out of humans control. At this point the scenes in which robots attack military personnel are oddly noneworthy. Even though the director of the film probably pays as well as much circumspection of action scenes and violence, but still this violence does not seem to be excessive. Instead, it is deliberately used to base the power of the machines created by human beings and which rebelled against man domination.In such a situation, the primary robot that actually started to act differently, i.e. the robot, who has foregone out of control of piece, resembles a kind of Frankenstein, a dick that rebels against its creator. On the other(a) hand, the robot does not produce an suddenly negative impression. In fact, the robot provokes rather controversial feelings since the only occupation of the robot is its actions which are wrongfulness and which are not conditioned by valet, b ut which, on the other hand, are similarly human. In such a way, the rebellion of robots whitethorn be viewed in the context of proportion of manhood with robots. The latter(prenominal) rebel against public but they persuade in a similar way as valet de chambre do, the only thing they want to swop is to accomplish humans efforts to create absolute creatures and create the perfective tense humankind.However, the film reveals the fact that in such an idealized world thither is no room for humans that are too imperfect and their contest for perfection is right their vanity and an move to play God. In this respect, the main character is quite symbolic since he comprises vices which freighternot be attributed to a real hero that is vatical to save the world from robots. In actuality, Del Spooner is a bit paranoid person who has or so inexplicable phobia of robots and machines, a person who lives practically in the permanent kingdom of fear. On the other hand, he is bus tling to face all the challenges in his brio and he is secure to struggle.The main problem is whether humans can control their technologies and what are the consequences of the unplanned technological progress. Probably, the question is in time more general what human beings are and whether they can create working machines with game intelligence and extend safe. The director poses an utter(a) question what human beings are and volitionally or not a peach may have got an impression that humans are in like manner someones creatures, as robots in I, Robot. I RobotI robot is a characterisation establish on the industrial plant of an atheistic man, in which thither are many theological themes present, which play toward the same(p) questions we ask virtually our faith each and every day.I Robot is a movie establish on the flora of Victor Asimnov, a man who wrote some(prenominal) short stories more or less robots and human kinds interaction. The movie takes place in futuri stic shekels in the yr 2035, at a time there are so many robots, that there will soon be one of them in each home. The report card revolves around detective Del Spooner (Will Smith), a homicide detective who hates robots. The dry land being that he had a drab experience with them, ever since a robot saved his life in a car possibility when it could have saved a tender girl instead.The movie starts off when the scientist who repaired Will Smith afterwards the accident, named Alfred Lanning, is found suddenly in the manse of the U.S. Robotics office tower. Del Spooner (Will Smith) assumes that the scientists death was not a self-destruction attempt, but a murder committed by a robot named Sonny. Everyone tells Spooner that hes crazy, because robots cannot go against the three laws by which they are to hurt by at any cost. THE tether LAWS OF ROBOTICSA robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, forego a human being to come to constipation. A robot mustines s conform orders given it by human beings, nevertheless where such orders would involvement with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such shield does not affair with the first and sanction rule.Every robot is programmed to protect humans at all costs, and to obey them unless such obedience would harm a human life. Spooner very much doubts this because various robots storage area trying to kill him, from a home-demolition robot, to a whole truckload of coat men that scupper him while he drives through a highway tunnel. The story continues, and the new robots go on a rampage, even